The story went like this: The Jewish Center for Special
Education on 1760 53rd was
concerned because their children are dismissed at 3pm and a parade, for the
Jewish holiday of Log B’omer, had been announced along with street closures for
tomorrow. The yeshiva called the police several times for clarity and instructions
but their calls were not returned. So they phoned my office.
My assistant, with alacrity, called our friends at the police
department to make certain there would be no issues for the yeshiva, the students
or their parents. Assured that all was copacetic, she was relaying this
information to the yeshiva’s staff when...
Suddenly someone was Tweeting (or is it Twittering?) the
following: “Dov Hikind – Why are you calling NYPD to shut down Log B’omer
parade! Terrible to do this – you were invited!”
Indeed, I was
invited, and planned to attend. Still do.
Fortunately, we were able to correct this anonymous Tweet
dropper and the twits who follow him/her/it (I have no idea who the person
behind this Twitter handle is… and even if I do,
I’m not telling).
Our reply: “Staffer called PD to make sure special needs children can get down 17th w/o problems. I plan to attend parade.”
Was the anonymous Tweeter mean-spirited? Was this just
a hasty response to something he/she didn’t understand or misconstrued? Or was there
something malevolent intended in this squeaky Tweet?
The truth is, one never knows. That’s the problem with “information” and “inside scoops” from anonymous sources. Twitter—and I dare say Facebook, message boards, and even so-called “news” sites—are filled with digital graffiti artists; people with agendas hiding behind walls of anonymity.
Author Harlan Ellison once noted to one of his proteges that the Internet is the
greatest villain of the 21st Century because it makes all information suspect. It makes the
super information highway that much harder to travel.
But for small rodents lurking in shadows, it’s a field
day.
No comments:
Post a Comment